Houston Municipal Employees Pension System

Membership Total Net Assets Social Security Participation Contributions Contribution Type Fiscal Year End
Active: 11,883
Annuitant: 12,204
$4,360,172,111 Yes Employee: 3.00 %
Employer: 28.81 %
Actuarial June

HMEPS was created in 1943 by an act of the 48th Legislature, and codified under Article 6243g, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. The System was recodified by the 77th Texas Legislature in 2001 under Article 6243h, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. The System is a multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan that provides service retirement, disability retirement and death benefits for all full-time municipal employees, except police officers and firefighters (other than certain police officers in the System as authorized by the Statute), elected City officials, full-time employees of the System, and eligible beneficiaries. Member contributions are split into three groups; group A contributes 8%, Group B contributes 4%, and Group D contributes 3%. City contribution rates are based on a two-part statutory funding requirement consisting of the 2016 UAAL amortized over a closed 30-year period paid on a fixed contribution schedule plus an amount determined in each subsequent Risk Sharing Valuation Study (RSVS) that includes normal cost and amortization of additional gains and losses. As of the 7/1/2024 RSVS city contributions for FY 2024 were 8.48% of payroll plus $146 million.

A retirement system's effective amortization period is defined by the PRB as the time it would theoretically take to fully fund the system's unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL), if any exists, using the system's chosen asset valuation method. Some systems provided an amortization period using both the market value of assets and the actuarial value of assets. If only one was below 30, the smaller value is reflected on this page. The effective amortization period assumes no future gains or losses and factors in both the plan's stated and historical contribution policy. The calculation is done at each actuarial valuation which is conducted every year or every two years. Plans with a funding surplus are reported with an amortization period of zero.

A retirement system's funded ratio is a one-time snapshot of the percentage of its actuarial accrued liability that is funded by its actuarial value of assets at the time of measurement.

Contributions into a retirement system are typically made by the employer and the employees and are often reported as a percentage of payroll. Texas statute requires systems to report a recommended contribution rate needed for the system to achieve and maintain an amortization period that does not exceed 30 years, shown in the chart as the actuarially determined contribution (ADC). If the plan does not report contributions on a percentage of payroll basis, no data will appear.

Pension funding requires assumptions to be made about the future, which are called actuarial assumptions. These assumptions along with current plan participant data and benefits are used to project future benefit obligations. Actuarial methods are used to calculate a system's liabilities, current and future costs, as well as amortization payments.

The market value of assets of a retirement system is generally the value at which assets owned by the system could be traded in the markets. This figure is also referred to as the fiduciary net position in accounting valuations (GASB 67).

Net pension liability (NPL) is the total pension liability (TPL) of the retirement system minus the system's fiduciary net position (FNP) or market value of assets, as reported in accounting valuations. This graph displays the effect that +/-1% changes in the discount rate would have had on the system's NPL and associated funded ratio (FNP/TPL) in each year depicted.

Non-investment cash flow is the annual contributions less benefit payments and expenses of the fund, as a percentage of ending total net assets. On its face, negative non-investment cash flow may not be an indicator of distress. For mature retirement systems, slightly negative non-investment cash flow (e.g. -1% to -3%) is the desired aim of pre-funding the system, allowing for lower contribution requirements. Significant negative noninvestment cash flow (e.g. less than -3%) over time, however, can be an indicator of distress, particularly for a plan that is not receiving its full ADC. For a retirement plan with a low funded ratio, significant negative cash flow can cause liquidity concerns and further imperil the plan by requiring too many of the assets to be held in liquid investments (which depresses investment experience) and/or by requiring imprudent liquidation of assets. Most public pension plans in Texas have a negative cash flow.

This graph displays the contributions and distributions by the retirement system over the past ten years. Contributions include those from both the employer and employees. Distributions include benefit payments, withdrawals, and refunds to current and former plan members.

The types of expenses that go into running a retirement fund include investment-related, administrative, and occasionally, other miscellaneous expenses. The graph displays the retirement system's total expenses as a percentage of assets. Due to inconsistencies in reporting of investment expenses, this data may not be an entirely accurate depiction of true investment-related expenses paid.

Investment returns make up an essential part of a retirement system's funding strategy. The graph shows the most recently reported short- and medium-term investment rates of return compared with the rate of return the plan assumes it will make on its investments. Figures obtained from the most recent investment return and assumptions reports. All figures are net of fees.

A retirement system's investments are diversified to manage risk while maximizing returns. The asset allocation is guided by its investment policy which is adjusted by the system periodically. Figures obtained from the most recent annual financial reports and may differ from allocation targets in investment policy statements. The PRB reclassifies mutual fund investments into the underlying asset classes, when the necessary information is provided.

Other includes:capital assets, receivables, securities lending collateral, liabilities and cash.

Key Plan Provisions
Group A
Eligible Members Hired before 9/1/1981, or btwn 9/1/1999 & 1/1/2008, or former member of Group B or C who elected to join Group A
Age/YCS 62/5
Benefit Formula (Accrued benefit before 1/1/2005) + Years of Credited Service after 1/1/2005 x 2.50% (First 20 YCS) then 3.25% (>20 YCS) x Final Average Salary; max 90% of FAS
Final Average Salary Highest 36 months
COLA 50% of rolling 5-year net return minus 5%. Min 0%, Max 2%. No COLA in DROP accounts of active employees under age 62.
DROP/PROP Provisions Forward DROP, no max. Interest credit: 50% rolling 5-yr net investment return (min 2.5%, max 7.5%). COLA credited after 1/1/2018 if member > 62 years. Eff. 1/1/2005, employee contributions not credited.
Group B
Eligible Members Hired btwn 9/1/1981 & 9/1/1999 and did not elect to become a Group A member
Age/YCS 62/5
Benefit Formula (Accrued benefit before 1/1/2005) + Years of Credited Service after 1/1/2005 x 1.75% (First 10 YCS) then 2.0% (10 to 20 YCS) then 2.5% (>20 YCS) x Final Average Salary; max 90% of FAS
Final Average Salary Highest 36 months
COLA 50% of rolling 5-year net return minus 5%. Min 0%, Max 2%. No COLA in DROP accounts of active employees under age 62.
DROP/PROP Provisions Forward DROP, no max. Interest credit: 50% rolling 5-yr net investment return (min 2.5%, max 7.5%). COLA credited after 1/1/2018 if member > 62 years. Eff. 1/1/2005, employee contributions not credited.
Group D
Eligible Members Hired on/after 1/1/2008
Age/YCS 62/5
Benefit Formula Years of Credited Service x 1.80% (First 25 YCS) then 1.0% (>25 YCS) x Final Average Salary; max 90% of FAS
Final Average Salary Highest 36 months
COLA 50% of rolling 5-year net return minus 5%. Min 0%, Max 2%.
DROP/PROP Provisions None

"Full retirement" is the term for the age and years of service required to retire without any reduction in a member's retirement benefits. The table details the benefit a member of the retirement system will receive at retirement if they have met the system's full retirement criteria.

As a retirement system matures, its ratio of active to retired members will naturally decrease as retired members make up a greater percentage of a system's membership. The PRB includes retirees as well as beneficiaries in the count of retired members, and all active members (both vested and non-vested) in its active member count. Vested terminated members are not included in either value. If the plan does not have either active members or annuitant members, no data will appear.

Board Composition
Active Employee Four members must be municipal employees who are members of the pension system with at least 5 years of credited service and elected by active members of the pension system with no term specified.
Retiree Two members must be retirees receiving a retirement pension from the system, have at least five years of service in the pension system, and not currently a city officer or employee who is elected by retirees of the pension system with no term specified.
Sponsor Government One member is appointed by mayor and must not be a participant or beneficiary in the pension system to serve a three-year term. One member is appointed by the city controller and must not be a participant or beneficiary in the pension system to serve a three-year term. Two members must be appointed by the governing body of the city and must not be participants or beneficiaries of the pension system to serve a three-year term.
Citizen One member is appointed by elected Board of Trustee members, must have been a resident of the state for the three years preceding the date of initial appointment to serve a three-year term.
Governing Statute Article 6243h, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes

Texas retirement systems are required to have a governing body to oversee the investment and expenditure of funds and the administration of benefits. The board of trustees has the fiduciary responsibility for the system's assets and is typically comprised of representatives from stakeholder groups such as active and retired members, sponsoring entities, and citizens/taxpayers. Board composition and member selection processes vary from system to system.

Benefit and Contribution Decision-Making
Employer Contribution Under a statutorily determined process, the City pays a predetermined fixed dollar amount (City Contribution Amount) based on the UAAL as of July 1, 2016 (Legacy Liability), plus a city contribution rate (CCR) as a percent of payroll. The CCR is jointly determined by the Pension Board and the City. The CCR must remain within a predetermined corridor until the plan is 100% funded. The corridor is built around target levels for CCR (“midpoints”).
Employee Contribution Some combination of statutorily determined actions must take place to bring the CCR back within the corridor should it rise above the maximum. This may include increases in employee contributions. While the plan is less than 100% funded, employee contributions can be decreased only to reverse a previous increase. If the plan is over 100% funded, but greater than 90% funded,, employee contributions can be decreased as long as the funded ratio would remain over 100% after the decrease in contributions.
Benefit Increase Under a statutorily determined process, while the fund is less than 100% funded, but greater than 90% funded, benefits may only be increased to restore benefits that were previously reduced after triggering the corridor maximum process. The benefit restoration would be under a joint agreement between the City and the Pension Board. If the plan is over 100% funded, the Pension Board and City may jointly increase benefits only if the funded ratio would remain over 100% after the increase in benefits.
Benefit Reduction Some combination of statutorily determined actions must take place to bring the CCR back within the corridor should it rise above the maximum. This may include benefit reductions.
Constitutional Protection No. However, the governing statute states that neither the city nor the pension board can make any unilateral changes to the pension plan.

Decisions relating to contribution levels and benefit provisions are governed differently across Texas' diverse public retirement systems. This table shows how, and by whom, decisions related to contributions and benefits are made and whether there is protection for these benefits in the Texas Constitution.

Plan Contact Information

(713) 595-0100
1201 Louisiana
Suite 900
Houston, TX 77002

Locate a Pension Plan

Select a plan and view key indicators of financial health over time.

This data center contains information reported by retirement systems to the PRB in annual financial reports, actuarial valuations and other studies, and investment and membership reports. The information may not reflect a system’s current status, only its most recently reported information. Deadlines for reporting information vary and may be viewed here. Historical data and trends presented are not intended to predict future events or continuing trends.

The information in this data center is intended to meet the Texas Government Code Section 801.209(a) requirement to post each public retirement system’s most recent data from reports required under Chapter 802, as well as to meet the Section 2054.1265 requirement for state agencies to post high-value data sets created or maintained by the agency on a generally accessible internet website maintained by or for the agency.

This site is best viewed using the current browser version of Firefox, Chrome, Safari, or Microsoft Edge; some features may not work in Internet Explorer.